Skip to main content

3.2 Decision Rights and RACI: The Permission Matrix

Ambiguity in authority creates paralysis. When three people think they "own" a decision, the result is endless debate. When no one thinks they own it, the result is inaction.

To operate at speed, we treat Decision Rights like software permissions. Every major operational action has a hard-coded "Owner" (Write Access) and "Validator" (Read/Check Access).

The Golden Rule of Authority

Authority follows Responsibility.

If you are responsible for the outcome (the P&L, the quality metric, the deadline), you automatically hold the decision right on how to achieve it.

  • The Test: If it breaks, who gets the phone call at 2 AM? That person decides.

The Decision Matrix

We segregate authority by Risk Class. These rights are absolute unless a specific Waiver is signed.

Category

Decision Trigger

Decision Owner (The "A")

Veto Authority

Financial

Expense < $1k

Team Lead

None

Financial

Expense > $10k / CapEx

Dept Head + CFO

CEO

Hiring

New Offer Letter

Hiring Manager

Bar Raiser (HR/Peer)

Quality

Stop Shipment / Line Stop

Quality Engineer

None (CEO cannot override Safety)

Commercial

Non-Standard Contract Terms

Sales Director

Legal / COO

Engineering

Architecture / Tech Stack

CTO / Chief Engineer

None

Supply Chain

New Vendor Approval

Procurement Head

Quality (if audit fails)

Critical Control: The Quality Veto

In manufacturing, the Quality Department holds the "Nuclear Key."

  • The Rule: Operations owns the Schedule, but Quality owns the Release.
  • Scenario: The VP of Sales wants to ship to hit a target. The Quality Engineer sees a 0.5% failure rate spike.
  • The Outcome: The unit does not ship. Quality has absolute Veto power over Revenue when technical standards are violated.

The RACI Model (Simplified)

We use RACI to define roles for specific projects. However, most RACI charts fail because they are too complex. We use a simplified definition:

  • R = Responsible (The Doer): The person doing the actual work (writing code, soldering, negotiating). Multiple Rs allowed.
  • A = Accountable (The Owner): The single person whose neck is on the line. They have the final "Yes/No." Rule: There can only be ONE "A".
  • C = Consulted (The Expert): People who provide input before the decision. They have influence, but no vote.
  • I = Informed (The Broadcast): People told about the decision after it is made.

Common RACI Failures:

  1. Too many "A"s: If two people are Accountable, no one is.
  2. "C" as Veto: Consulted people provide data. They do not decide. If the "A" disagrees with the "C," the "A" decides and documents the risk.

Escalation Logic: Breaking Deadlocks

Disagreement is healthy; gridlock is expensive. When two functional heads (e.g., Ops vs. Eng) disagree, use this escalation path.

Level 1. The Data Fight

  • Action: Both parties must produce a one-page data summary supporting their view.
  • Rule: Data > Opinion. If one side has data and the other has a "feeling," the data wins immediately.

Level 2. The "Disagree and Commit"

  • Action: If data is inconclusive, the "A" (Accountable Owner) makes the call.
  • Rule: The dissenting party must fully support the execution. Sabotage or "I told you so" behavior is a performance violation.

Level 3. The CEO Tie-Breaker

  • Action: Submit a Decision Memo (see below).
  • Rule: Using the CEO as a referee is a failure of management alignment. Do this sparingly.

Artifact: The Decision Memo

Do not schedule a meeting to present a complex decision without a pre-read. Use this template to force clarity.

Format: 1 Page Max.

Header: [Decision Title] | [Date] | [Owner]

1. The Context:

  • What is the problem? (1-2 sentences).

2. The Options:

  • Option A: (Description + Cost + Risk).
  • Option B: (Description + Cost + Risk).
  • Option C: (Do Nothing - Always include this baseline).

3. The Recommendation:

  • We propose Option A because [Data Point 1] and [Data Point 2].

4. The Dissent:

  • Department X disagrees because [Reason]. We have mitigated this by [Action].

5. The Ask:

  • [Approve / Reject / Discuss]

Final Checklist

Check

Requirement

The "One A" Rule

Every project/metric has exactly one Accountable person.

Quality Autonomy

Quality Dept can stop production without permission.

Meeting Rule

No decision meetings without a written Decision Memo.

Deadlock Breaker

In absence of data, the "A" decides.

Documentation

Major decisions are logged in the project tracker, not lost in Slack.