2.5 Workmanship and Acceptance Criteria
Quality cannot be negotiated after the solder has cooled. Subjective terms like "good enough," "neat," or "strong" have no place in manufacturing; they are breeding grounds for disputes between the EMS provider and the client. To ensure consistent output, the Golden Data Pack must lock the workmanship standard to a binary Pass/Fail logic governed by industry-validated specifications.
The Governing Standards
Distinguish between the process of soldering and the inspection of the result.
1. J-STD-001: The Process Standard
- Function: Defines the materials, methods, and process controls required to build the assembly (e.g., flux types, gold removal, cleanliness testing).
- Usage: Used by Process Engineers to set up the line.
2. IPC-A-610: The Acceptance Standard
- Function: Defines the visual acceptance criteria for the final product. It provides the "Target," "Acceptable," "Process Indicator," and "Defect" conditions.
- Usage: Used by Quality Control (QC) inspectors and AOI machines.
Defining the Class (The Reliability Tier)
Inspection criteria change drastically based on the Class. A 25% overhang on a component is a Pass for Class 2 but a Fail for Class 3.
- Rule: The Data Pack must explicitly state the IPC Class.
- Default Protocol: If the customer does not specify a Class, Then the Project Manager must declare IPC-A-610 Class 2 as the default before the build begins.
The Three Classes:
- Class 1 (General Electronic Products): Consumer electronics, toys. Function is primary; cosmetic imperfections are acceptable.
- Class 2 (Dedicated Service Electronic Products): Laptops, appliances, industrial controls. Uninterrupted service is required, but not critical.
- Class 3 (High Performance/Harsh Environment): Medical, Automotive, Aerospace. Equipment must function on demand; no downtime allowed.
Pro-Tip: Do not default to Class 3 "just to be safe." Class 3 requires stricter barrel fill (75% vs 50%) and tighter component alignment, driving up cost and inspection time without necessarily improving function for a consumer device.
Critical Acceptance Logic
Convert the 400-page IPC manual into focused inspection rules for the line.
1. Solder Joint Geometry
A joint is verified by the wetting angle and fillet shape.
- Wetting: The solder must form a concave meniscus.
- Fail: Convex (bulbous) shapes indicate non-wetting or excess solder.
- Fail: Contact angle > 90° (beading) on the pad.
- Vertical Fill (Through-Hole):
- Class 2: ≥ 50% vertical fill of the barrel is required.
- Class 3: ≥ 75% vertical fill is required.
2. Component Placement & Alignment
- Side Overhang:
- Class 2: Component termination may overhang the pad width by ≤ 50%.
- Class 3: Component termination may overhang the pad width by ≤ 25%.
- Toe Overhang: Strictly Forbidden. The component termination must not overhang the pad length (toe) in any Class.
3. Cleanliness & Residue
- Flux Residue:
- No-Clean: Visible residue is acceptable if it is non-sticky and does not obstruct visual inspection.
- Water Soluble: Zero visible residue allowed. White powder indicates a cleaning process failure.
- Solder Balls: Any solder ball that is not entrapped (i.e., can be dislodged by a brush) is a Defect.
Inspection Magnification
More magnification is not better. Over-magnification leads to "false failures" by highlighting surface graininess that is structurally sound.
Standard Magnification Levels (J-STD-001):
- Land Width ≥ 1.0 mm: 1.75X – 4X
- Land Width 0.5 – 1.0 mm: 4X – 10X
- Land Width 0.25 – 0.5 mm: 10X – 20X
- Land Width < 0.25 mm: 20X – 40X
Final Checklist
Control Point | Critical Requirement |
Standard Declaration | IPC-A-610 (Visual) + J-STD-001 (Process). |
Class Selection | Must be defined (1, 2, or 3). Default to Class 2. |
Wetting Angle | Must be Concave (< 90°). Convex = Reject. |
Barrel Fill | ≥ 50% (Class 2) or ≥ 75% (Class 3). |
Toe Overhang | 0% allowed. Lead must sit on pad. |
Magnification | Cap inspection at 10X for standard SMT to reduce false calls. |
Gold Removal | Mandatory tinning if gold thickness > 2.54 µm (to prevent embrittlement). |